PART THREE
Historical and International Movements
Chapter 3: Liberty Movements Around the World
Objectivist and classical liberal ideas have inspired organized movements, institutions, and policy reforms on every inhabited continent. This chapter surveys several of the most significant, with attention to the specific ideals each promoted and the measurable outcomes associated with them.
3.1 The United States: Institutional Objectivism
In the United States, Objectivism developed formal institutional homes after Rand’s death in 1982. The Ayn Rand Institute, founded by Leonard Peikoff in 1985, promotes the philosophy through publishing, campus outreach, and an annual essay contest for students that reaches tens of thousands of entrants annually. The Atlas Society, founded in 1990 as a more open and pluralistic alternative, similarly promotes Objectivist ideas through public programming, including animated explainer content aimed at younger audiences. Both organizations promote the same core ideals: individual rights, rational self-interest, and laissez-faire capitalism, while differing on questions of organizational openness and doctrinal flexibility.
Beyond explicitly Objectivist organizations, the wider American libertarian and free-market movement includes think tanks such as the Cato Institute (founded 1977) and the Foundation for Economic Education (founded 1946, making it the oldest free-market think tank in the United States), both of which promote property rights, free trade, and limited government, drawing on Rand, Mises, Hayek, and Friedman alike.
3.2 Post-Communist Eastern Europe: Liberalization After 1989
Few historical episodes illustrate the practical case for economic liberalization as starkly as the transition of Central and Eastern European economies after the fall of the Iron Curtain in 1989. Poland’s “shock therapy” reforms of 1990, designed chiefly by economist Leszek Balcerowicz, rapidly liberalized prices, opened the economy to trade, and privatized state enterprises. Estonia pursued an even more thoroughgoing liberalization in the 1990s, adopting a flat income tax in 1994 — among the first countries in the world to do so — and pursuing aggressive trade liberalization and digital-government modernization.
Ideals promoted: Private property rights, price liberalization, free trade, and a minimal, low-tax state, drawing explicitly on the Austrian and Chicago School traditions of Mises, Hayek, and Friedman, several of whose works were translated and widely read by reform-era policymakers in the region.
By the 2000s, Estonia and Poland had become two of the most consistently cited European success stories of post-communist transition, both eventually joining the European Union (2004) and, in Estonia’s case, becoming a global leader in e-governance and a hub for technology start-ups, including the company that created Skype.
3.3 Chile: The Early Latin American Case
Chile’s market reforms beginning in the mid-1970s, associated with a group of Chilean economists trained at the University of Chicago and known as the “Chicago Boys,” introduced sweeping privatization, trade liberalization, and a privatized pension system that became an internationally studied model, later partially emulated by several other countries. Although the political circumstances under which these reforms began remain a subject of serious historical controversy, the economic liberalization that followed in the 1980s and 1990s — alongside Chile’s later return to democratic governance in 1990 — coincided with the country becoming, by the early twenty-first century, one of the highest-income and most stable economies in Latin America, with per-capita income consistently ranked among the region’s highest.
Ideals promoted: Property rights, privatized social security, trade openness, and an independent central bank, drawing directly on Friedman’s monetary economics and the broader Chicago School emphasis on empirical, market-tested policy.
3.4 Hong Kong and Singapore: Economic Freedom in Asia
Hong Kong, under British administration until 1997 and a Special Administrative Region of China thereafter, was for decades ranked the world’s freest economy by the Heritage Foundation’s Index of Economic Freedom, owing to its low, simple tax structure, free trade, and minimal regulatory burden. Singapore, independent since 1965, combined a more activist state in areas such as housing and infrastructure with extremely open trade and investment policies, low corporate taxation, and strong rule-of-law protections for property and contracts. Both jurisdictions transformed from relatively low-income territories in the mid-twentieth century into high-income, globally connected economies within a single generation.
Ideals promoted: Free trade, low taxation, strong contract enforcement, and openness to foreign investment and capital — illustrating, particularly in Hong Kong’s case, a close real-world approximation of laissez-faire principles.
3.5 New Zealand: Rogernomics
Facing a severe fiscal and balance-of-payments crisis in the mid-1980s, New Zealand’s Labour government under Finance Minister Roger Douglas undertook a rapid program of deregulation, subsidy elimination (including the removal of all agricultural subsidies in 1984, a policy still studied internationally), trade liberalization, and central bank reform, including the world’s first explicit inflation-targeting regime, adopted in 1989. The reform program, nicknamed “Rogernomics,” reoriented one of the most heavily subsidized agricultural economies in the developed world toward open competition.
Ideals promoted: Removal of market-distorting subsidies, central bank independence focused on price stability, and trade liberalization — principles closely associated with both Hayek’s monetary theory and Friedman’s monetarism.
| Movement / Region | Period | Key Reform Focus |
| Poland & Estonia | 1990s | Price liberalization, privatization, flat tax |
| Chile | 1975–2000s | Privatized pensions, trade openness |
| Hong Kong | 1950s–present | Low taxation, free trade, light regulation |
| Singapore | 1965–present | Open investment, contract enforcement |
| New Zealand | 1984–1990s | Subsidy removal, inflation targeting |
Discussion Questions
- Compare two of the movements profiled in this chapter. What ideals did they share, and what circumstances led each country to adopt them?
- Estonia and Hong Kong both relied heavily on low, simple taxation. Research their current tax structures — are these policies still in place today?
- Why might economists trained in a single school of thought, such as the “Chicago Boys,” have such an outsized influence when they return to advise their home governments?
About the Author
